The store will not work correctly when cookies are disabled.
We are in the process of migrating the LexisNexis Canada e-store, during this transition some customers may not be able to sign into their e-store account. If you encounter an issue signing in, please use the available Guest Checkout option
This text offers a theoretical and pragmatic analysis of the different aspects of the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Reference re Secession of Quebec, including the background and context leading up to the opinion.
In August 1998, the Supreme Court of Canada handed down one of the most important decisions in recent history: Reference re Secession of Quebec. … The 1998 Reference is most significant because, for the very first time in modern history, a national court considered the tough question of the legal characterization of secession by a federated unit (a province) within a democratic state.
So begins the introduction to this new volume, The Law of Independence, by leading academics and lawyers Frédéric Bérard and Stéphane Beaulac. As they explain, Reference re Secession of Quebec is a landmark judgment regarding the legality, under both Canadian and international law, of a unilateral secession of Quebec from Canada and their text offers a theoretical and pragmatic analysis of the different aspects of the Supreme Court of Canada's decision, including the background and context leading up to the opinion. A comparative study of the nationalist movements and/or referenda in Montenegro, Kosovo, Scotland and Catalonia is also conducted, with a view to shedding light onto the law of independence.
Comprehensive content The Law of Independence succinctly summarizes and analyzes the seminal 1998 opinion as well as the international influence of the case on other jurisdictions. Written in a clear and easy-to-understand manner, this authoritative text:
Summarizes the facta filed by the Attorney General of Canada and the amicus curiae in Re Secession, as well as the fundamental aspects of the pleadings of the various intervenors
Through discussion and analysis of the Court's opinion on the legality of a secession in Canadian law, exposes the misconceptions propagated by the Quebec sovereigntist movement, including the myths that the secessionist question may not be resolved by the courts, the paramountcy of international law over state law in this situation and the right of the province of Quebec to secede unilaterally based on the principle of effectivity
Examines the aspects of international law discussed in the opinion and the arguments presented by the amicus curiae which were deemed by the Court to lack credibility
Points out the shortcomings in the analysis of some sovereigntist scholars advocating for a people's right to self-determination
Demonstrates the small chance of receiving international recognition if Quebec were to make a unilateral attempt at sovereignty, as well as the difficulties associated with taking control of the Quebec territory in a manu militari style
Offers an international perspective, aided by different case studies of Montenegro, Scotland, Kosovo and Catalonia, to show how foreign public law and, most importantly, international law – together constituting the law of independence – have evolved with regard to questions of secession and a people's right to self-determination
Further explains how every population that has held a referendum regarding their independence in the past 15 years – including Scotland, Montenegro and Kosovo – were somehow inspired by Canada's past experience
Illustrates how this Supreme Court of Canada opinion, as well as similar foreign precedents, do not merely represent isolated cases, but are parts of a mosaic of practices and rules which together govern the way in which different territories, within existing states, may become full-fledged sovereign nations
Beside the two Balkan precedents (Montenegro, Kosovo), covers the two most recent cases involving secession and the people's right to self-determination, the Scottish referendum and the present obstacles faced by Catalonia, and focuses on the many elements of the process of reaching internationally recognized independence
Contextualizes the relevance of the 1998 opinion which must now be interpreted in light of recent foreign decisions and comments upon these issues while bringing the debate back to Canada and Quebec
Concludes with a brief comment on the Federal Clarity Bill and Quebec Bill 99
A useful resource An engaging read, The Law of Independence would be especially valuable to:
Constitutional lawyers and international lawyers in Canada who must advise their clients and understand the law of independence (self-determination, secession)
Libraries who want to provide reference materials for constitutional lawyers and students of international law
Government professionals in Canada including judges, constitutional counsel and advisors on matters of international law
International readers such as international governments, lawyers, politicians, law professors and policy makers
All individuals interested in history or political science
Chapter 1: Reference re Secession of Quebec Chapter 2: The Supreme Court's Answers to the First Question Chapter 3: The Supreme Court's Answers to the Second Question Chapter 4: International Perspective Conclusion
Stéphane Beaulac, LL.L., LL.B., LL.M., Ph.D., is a full professor at the Université de Montréal, and, for 2016-17, a Flaherty visiting professor (Ireland). His background is bijural: civil law at Ottawa (summa cum laude) and common law at Dalhousie (first in the national program); he clerked at the Supreme Court of Canada. Dr. Beaulac earned his LL.M. (first class honours) as well as a Ph.D. in international public law at the University of Cambridge. He began his academic career at Dalhousie Law School in 1998. He was a Max Weber Fellow at the European University Institute in Florence, a Neil MacCormick Fellow at the University of Edinburgh School of Law and a visiting professor in Amsterdam, Ulster and Trento. His writings have won awards and have been cited by the International Court of Justice in The Hague. A public intellectual, he regularly contributes to current debates in the media.
Frédéric Bérard, LL.B., M.A., Ph.D., is co-director of the National Observatory on language rights and a adjunct professor at the Faculty of Law at the Université de Montréal. He has been recognized by the Revue des libraires as 'one of the top 10 essayists under 40 who are transforming today's Québec.' He holds a Bachelor of Laws from the Université de Montréal (1999-List of Excellence) an M.A. in political science from McGill University and a Ph.D. (Mention of Excellence) in public law from Université de Montréal. Dr. Bérard is a seven-time winner of the André-Morel Excellence in Teaching Award (UdeM) and won an identic award at McGill University. A TED speaker, he is a sought-after commentator, as well as a political and legal columnist with various media, including Radio-Canada, TVA and Journal Métro.
Frédéric Bérard est titulaire d'un baccalauréat en droit de l'Université de Montréal et d'une maîtrise en sciences politiques de l'Université McGill, où il a également poursuivi des études doctorales et reçu la prestigieuse Bourse CRSH. Chargé de cours à la Faculté de droit de l'Université de Montréal depuis 2003, où il enseigne des cours en droit constitutionnel, en droit administratif et en interprétation des lois, Me Bérard est le quintuple récipiendaire du Prix d'excellence professorale André-Morel, en 2008, 2011, 2012, 2013 et 2014. Il figure également, à titre d'étudiant, sur la liste d'excellence de cette même faculté, où il est actuellement doctorant. En plus d'avoir pratiqué le litige commercial et administratif au sein du cabinet Stikeman Elliott, il a été conseiller constitutionnel auprès de divers ministres et parlementaires au niveau fédéral et provincial. Il est notamment auteur des textes et ouvrages suivants : Fiscalité, financement public et pouvoir de dépenser (JurisClasseur 2011); La classification des actes administratifs (JurisClasseur 2013); La fin de l'État de droit (Éditions XYZ 2014); Le pouvoir réglementaire : caractéristiques générales et conditions de validité (Actualité juridique municipale 2014); De l'importance capitale de l'État de droit (Éditions Dialogue Nord-Sud 2014). Il publiera prochainement un ouvrage, cosigné avec Stéphane Beaulac, portant sur le droit à la sécession. Me Bérard intervient régulièrement auprès des divers médias québécois afin de commenter l'actualité juridico-politique.