The store will not work correctly when cookies are disabled.
We are in the process of migrating the LexisNexis Canada e-store, during this transition some customers may not be able to sign into their e-store account. If you encounter an issue signing in, Â please use the available Guest Checkout option
This collection of papers takes a fresh look at the nature and authority of conscience, and considers the extent to which the law should recognize claims of conscience.
Why should the law take claims of conscience seriously?
This is not an easy question to answer because there are many different accounts of what the conscience is, and many different views of the authority of conscience. Is conscience a faculty capable of moral knowledge, or merely a vague term for subjective moral feelings? Do conscience claims deserve public recognition and legal protection, or are they just expressions of private convictions?
One thing seems clear. A free society governed by the rule of law should avoid two extreme views of the conscience. At one extreme lies totalitarianism, in which individual conscience has no weight at all: central government is entitled to make one-size-fits-all laws for the good of the state, and conscientious objection is criminal defection. Yet, at the other extreme, conscience is divinized, treated as the very voice of God, and this may result in an antinomian, chaotic individualism. If anyone can defect from any law to which they conscientiously object, how can there be a society?
This collection was developed from the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy (IVR) World Congress in Bucharest, Romania in 2022. The essays take a fresh look at the nature and authority of conscience, and consider the extent to which the law should recognize claims of conscience.
The Collection of Papers
Angus J. L. Menuge and Barry W. Bussey − Introduction
Paul Copan − Some Preliminaries on Conscience, Morality, and the State
David Guretzki − Three-Dimensional Conscience: A Theo-Legal Proposal for Testing Conscience Claims
Hendrik Kaptein − Conscience Inside Out: From Inner Compunction to Common Reason in Action
Michał Rupniewski − Understanding Fundamental Rights: The Role of Conscience
Barry W. Bussey − The Independence of Judicial Conscience
Justice Dallas K. Miller and Angus J. L. Menuge − Public Policy in Crisis: When May the Government Override Rights of Conscience?
Barry W. Bussey, B.A., LL.B., M.A., LL.M., MPACS, PhD, practises law with Bussey Ainsworth, in Peterborough, Ontario, Canada. He has studied theology, law, political science, and peace & conflict studies. He is the editor of The Status of Religion and the Public Benefit in Charity Law (2020), Anthem Press; co-editor with Angus Menuge, The Inherence of Human Dignity Volume I: The Conceptual Foundations of Human Dignity & Volume II: Human Dignity and Religious Liberty, (2021), Anthem Press; and, co-editor with Iain T. Benson, the LexisNexis publication Religion, Liberty and the Jurisdictional Limits of Law (2017).
Angus J. L. Menuge, PhD, is Chair of the Philosophy Department, and Co-Chair of the Classical Education program at Concordia University Wisconsin. He holds a B.A. in philosophy from Warwick University, and a PhD in philosophy from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He is author of Agents Under Fire (Rowman and Littlefield, 2004) and many articles on the philosophy of mind, and editor of several collections, including Legitimizing Human Rights (Ashgate, 2013; Routledge, 2016), Religious Liberty and the Law (Routledge, 2017), and with Barry Bussey, The Inherence of Human Dignity, volumes 1 and 2 (Anthem, 2021). He is past president of the Evangelical Philosophical Society (2012-2018).