Moot: How to Win in Fake Court, and Other Valuable Lessons in Legal Rhetoric

"A unique combination of practical tips and academic pursuit. There is something in this book for everyone and some very useful assistance for first time mooters."

Norman Bacal
Mentor and Bestselling author of Breakdown and Take Charge

As litigator and author Akiva Stern states in the opening chapter of this new publication, “[m]ooting is a skill that does not come naturally to most law students. Rather, it is a function of continuous training and thought, so that one can apply oneself in a more proficient manner.” To help students with this process, Stern – himself an experienced and recognized mooter – spent several years conducting research and interviewing other competitive mooters on a national and international level with the goal of developing a guide to help law students with their mock trial experiences and to provide insight to the legal profession at large into the world of rhetoric and argumentation. Moot: How to Win in Fake Court, and Other Valuable Lessons in Legal Rhetoric is the result of those efforts.

A Much-Needed Resource
Divided into two main parts, this handbook offers guidance on both major aspects of mooting: formulating substantive arguments and delivering those arguments persuasively.

The section on substantive arguments focuses on breaking down the essential components of rhetoric. Each chapter builds on the previous one by offering a principle, discussing the generic logic behind it, applying it to the mooting setting, and then finishing with a case analysis.

The other section is based on qualitative research compiled from 30 hours of interviews, amongst 22 competitive mooting students from the Faculty of Law at the University of Windsor during which they shared their insights on mooting culture and what they learned from their experiences. In this section, Stern explores a range of topics, including confirmation bias and developing a mooting identity.

Moot: How To Win in Fake Court, and Other Valuable Lessons in Legal Rhetoric would be a useful resource for:

• First year law students taking legal research and writing and those who are participating in the moot program
• Upper year law students who are competitive mooters
• Students enrolled in: political science courses that focus on rhetoric and argumentation; negotiations, rhetoric and argumentation studies; and business negotiations/communications/dispute resolution courses, particularly at the J.D./M.B.A. level
• Academics can use it as a reference to help inform their understanding of the logic behind the rules of evidence and how they might apply to a given circumstance
• Associations that promote advocacy amongst their members will find this volume to be a useful addition to their library