Exculpatory Evidence: The Accused's Constitutional Right to Introduce Favorable Evidence

Chapter 1 Introduction
Chapter 2 The Existence and Extent of the Accused's Constitutional Right to Present Evidence
Chapter 2A The Existence of a Civil Litigant's Constitutional Right to Present Evidence
Chapter 3 Procedural Restrictions on the Admissibility of Defense Evidence
Chapter 4 Rules Rendering Persons Incompetent as Witnesses at Trial
Chapter 5 Rules Excluding Logically Irrelevant Evidence
Chapter 6 Rules Requiring Proof of the Underlying Logical Relevance of Evidence: The Personal Knowledge and Authentication Doctrines, Including the Validation of Scientific Evidence Rules of Logical Evidence
Chapter 7 Legal Relevance Doctrine Excluding Evidence Due to Probative Dangers Such as Prejudice and Time Consumption
Chapter 8 Legal Relevance Rules Limiting Admissibility of Evidence Logically Relevant to Impeach Adverse Witnesses
Chapter 9 Legal Relevance Rules Limiting The Admissibility of Evidence Logically Relevant to the Historical Merits
Chapter 10 Common Law and Statutory Privileges That Exclude Logically Relevant Evidence to Promote Extrinsic Social Policies
Chapter 11 Privileges Which Exclude Logically Relevant Information to Protect the Constitutional Rights of Private Persons
Chapter 12 Government Privileges
Chapter 13 The Best Evidence and Opinion Rules Excluding Unreliable Testimony
Chapter 14 The Hearsay Rule Excluding Unreliable Testimony
Chapter 15 Defense Advocacy for the Accused's Right to Present Evidence
Chapter 16 Conclusion
Appendices
Bibliography
Table of Cases
Index