Settlements With Underlying Layers Satisfy Exhaustion Conditions in Excess Policies (PDF)
In Quellos Group LLC v. Fed. Ins. Co., 2013 Wash. App. LEXIS 2626 (Nov. 12, 2013), the court allowed excess insurers to escape coverage for a loss on the grounds that the policyholder had entered into a negotiated settlement at less than full limits with a lower layer of coverage. The court held that this meant the underlying coverage was not properly exhausted, and therefore the excess layers could never be reached. This commentary disagrees.
Michael T. Sharkey is a partner in the insurance coverage practice of Perkins Coie LLP, where he represents policyholders in insurance coverage disputes nationwide. The opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and not necessarily those of any of his clients. He can be reached at MSharkey@PerkinsCoie.com.
Ask the LexisNexis experts - and get a complete answer based on today's law.
An authoritative analysis of important cases, codes, statutes, rulings, emerging issues or legal topics is available now - through LexisNexis Emerging Issues Analysis. The brain trust of LexisNexis authors - thousands of recognized authorities who develop the respected Matthew Bender®, Mealey's and Martindale-Hubbell® treatises and articles - produce this highly specific content. Each commentary covers an important case, code, statute, ruling or emerging issue such as subprime, nanotechnology, or climate change. More current and concentrated than treatises and more analytical than news, Emerging Issues Analysis bridges the information gap between the two, providing quick expert analysis of current developments in law.
Emerging Issues Analysis PDFs should be purchased individually or accessed through Lexis.com if you have a subscription.