Mellouli v. Holder: Removal from the United States for Possession of a Sock? (PDF)
Moones Mellouli was removed from the United States because he was convicted of having drug paraphernalia. The paraphernalia was a sock, in which he was keeping tablets of Adderall. But the conviction record did not say what drug he had in the sock, and the state list of controlled substances does not match the federal list. So, was it proper to remove him? The Supreme Court has heard argument on that question. What does this all mean?
Zelda Howell (http://whittenburglaw.com/team/zelda-howell/) is an associate at Whittenburg, Strange & Walker P.C., in its Amarillo, Texas, office. Before joining the Whittenburg firm, she was an associate in the second-largest immigration firm in the United States. She has a law degree from the University of Houston Law Center and an undergraduate degree from the University of Texas at Austin. She is a volunteer immigration attorney for Catholic Charities of Texas Panhandle (CCTXP). She also has written on a variety of immigration topics.
Ask the LexisNexis experts - and get a complete answer based on today's law.
An authoritative analysis of important cases, codes, statutes, rulings, emerging issues or legal topics is available now - through LexisNexis Emerging Issues Analysis. The brain trust of LexisNexis authors - thousands of recognized authorities who develop the respected Matthew Bender®, Mealey's and Martindale-Hubbell® treatises and articles - produce this highly specific content. Each commentary covers an important case, code, statute, ruling or emerging issue such as subprime, nanotechnology, or climate change. More current and concentrated than treatises and more analytical than news, Emerging Issues Analysis bridges the information gap between the two, providing quick expert analysis of current developments in law.
Emerging Issues Analysis PDFs should be purchased individually or accessed through Lexis.com if you have a subscription.