Birchfield v. North Dakota: Admissibility of Evidence of Defendant's Refusal to Submit to Chemical Testing--Unreasonable Searches and Seizures (PDF)
For chemical test results to be admissible in a drunk driving trial, the state must be able to show that statutory requirements were met. The U.S. Supreme Court's 2016 decision in Birchfield v. North Dakota has significantly changed the landscape with regard to implied consent and criminal refusal statutes. This Emerging Issues Analysis examines the impact of that case on the admissibility of chemical test results.
Richard E. Erwin, Esq. is an author of Defense of Drunk Driving Cases Criminal-Civil, Third Edition, Volume 1.
Ask the LexisNexis experts - and get a complete answer based on today's law.
An authoritative analysis of important cases, codes, statutes, rulings, emerging issues or legal topics is available now - through LexisNexis Emerging Issues Analysis. The brain trust of LexisNexis authors - thousands of recognized authorities who develop the respected Matthew Bender®, Mealey's and Martindale-Hubbell® treatises and articles - produce this highly specific content. Each commentary covers an important case, code, statute, ruling or emerging issue such as subprime, nanotechnology, or climate change. More current and concentrated than treatises and more analytical than news, Emerging Issues Analysis bridges the information gap between the two, providing quick expert analysis of current developments in law.
Emerging Issues Analysis PDFs should be purchased individually.