Skill Building
Trial-Ready
Law School Preferred

State v. Jordan

Select a format

Case File :Comb Bound
ISBN/ISSN: 9781556819346
In Stock
Price
$38.00
QTY
International Order Inquiry

Product details

At 5:32 p.m. Amy Jordan left her apartment. At 5:44 p.m. Arthur Moore turned to leave an ATM, only to be shot and killed. At 6:02 p.m. Amy Jordan returned to her apartment. Is it convenient or a coincidence that Amy's .38 caliber handgun was reported stolen eight days prior? According to the State of Nita it is not a coincidence but rather a fact that Amy shot her boyfriend, Arthur, in order to receive the proceeds of a life insurance policy. The case is complicated by the fact that Arthur's wife, Sandra, was the beneficiary for the remainder of the estate. There are four witnesses for both the plaintiff and the defendant--each of whom present largely circumstantial evidence.

Law professors may request the teaching notes for this publication by emailing ReviewCopy@lexisnexis.com .

Featured Authors

Table of contents

CASE FILE CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

STIPULATIONS

INDICTMENT

POLICE REPORT OF DETECTIVE TRACE RICHARDS

STATEMENTS

JOE SHAFFER
SANDRA MOORE
LEE SANDERS
LISA WATERMAN
KIM CROSS
JOHN CONKLIN

MEMO TO FILE

APPLICABLE NITA STATUTES

PHOTOS

BIKE PATH
MOUNTAIN BIKE
RIDING HELMET

PRELIMINARY INSTRUCTIONS

PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS

JURY VERDICT FORM