Halliburton v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. The Supreme Court Leaves the Presumption of Reliance Intact (PDF)
Select a format
In Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., should the Supreme Court reverse or substantially modify its decision in Basic, a 26-year old case that provides the primary basis for certifying securities law class actions. The Court decided not to modify Basic at all. This was viewed as potentially the most important securities law case in decades. What do these cases say about the Court's approach to securities law class actions going forward?
Jon Eisenberg is the General Editor of and a contributor to Litigating Securities Class Actions, a single-volume looseleaf treatise, published by LexisNexis, on the most critical issues that arise in securities class action litigation. He is also a partner with K&L Gates, LLC. The views expressed in this article are only those of Mr. Eisenberg.
Ask the LexisNexis experts - and get a complete answer based on today's law.
An authoritative analysis of important cases, codes, statutes, rulings, emerging issues or legal topics is available now - through LexisNexis Emerging Issues Analysis. The brain trust of LexisNexis authors - thousands of recognized authorities who develop the respected Matthew Bender®, Mealey's and Martindale-Hubbell® treatises and articles - produce this highly specific content. Each commentary covers an important case, code, statute, ruling or emerging issue such as subprime, nanotechnology, or climate change. More current and concentrated than treatises and more analytical than news, Emerging Issues Analysis bridges the information gap between the two, providing quick expert analysis of current developments in law.
Emerging Issues Analysis PDFs should be purchased individually or accessed through Lexis.com if you have a subscription.