American National Property & Casualty Co. v. Wyatt: Missouri Court Interprets Pollution Exclusion in Favor of Coverage (PDF)
Select a format
The interpretation and application of pollution exclusions still flummox parties and fill docket sheets. In Am. Nat'l Prop. & Cas. v. Wyatt, the Missouri Court of Appeals continues the line of authority supporting the proposition that the pollution exclusion must be reasonably interpreted within the confines of certain limiting principles. This commentary focuses on the court's acknowledgement of the original intention of the pollution exclusion.
Ncholas M. Insua is a Partner in the Newark, New Jersey office of McCarter & English, LLP. He may be reached by e-mail at email@example.com. Jennifer Black Strutt is an Associate in the Stamford, Connecticut office of McCarter & English, LLP. She may be reached by e-mail at firstname.lastname@example.org. The opinions in this article are those of the authors alone and do not represent the views of McCarter & English, LLP or any of its clients.
Ask the LexisNexis experts - and get a complete answer based on today's law.
An authoritative analysis of important cases, codes, statutes, rulings, emerging issues or legal topics is available now - through LexisNexis Emerging Issues Analysis. The brain trust of LexisNexis authors - thousands of recognized authorities who develop the respected Matthew Bender®, Mealey's and Martindale-Hubbell® treatises and articles - produce this highly specific content. Each commentary covers an important case, code, statute, ruling or emerging issue such as subprime, nanotechnology, or climate change. More current and concentrated than treatises and more analytical than news, Emerging Issues Analysis bridges the information gap between the two, providing quick expert analysis of current developments in law.
Emerging Issues Analysis PDFs should be purchased individually or accessed through Lexis.com if you have a subscription.