A Possible Solution to the Interregnum Problem (PDF)
Select a format
I previously concluded that Congress had created an interregnum. Decisions of the board declared both before and after the interregnum will be subject to court review, but decisions of the board in interferences declared during the interregnum will not. However, now we examine a contrary view for why the decisions of the board in interferences declared during the interregnum might be reviewable under either 35 USC 141 or 35 USC 146 after all.
Charles L. Gholz is a Partner in Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP; Alexandria, Virginia. His direct dial telephone number is 703/412-6485, and his email address is email@example.com.
Lisa M. Mandrusiak is an Associate in Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP; Alexandria, Virginia. Her direct dial telephone number is 703/412-6492, and her email address is firstname.lastname@example.org.
Ask the LexisNexis experts - and get a complete answer based on today's law.
An authoritative analysis of important cases, codes, statutes, rulings, emerging issues or legal topics is available now - through LexisNexis Emerging Issues Analysis. The brain trust of LexisNexis authors - thousands of recognized authorities who develop the respected Matthew Bender®, Mealey's and Martindale-Hubbell® treatises and articles - produce this highly specific content. Each commentary covers an important case, code, statute, ruling or emerging issue such as subprime, nanotechnology, or climate change. More current and concentrated than treatises and more analytical than news, Emerging Issues Analysis bridges the information gap between the two, providing quick expert analysis of current developments in law.
Emerging Issues Analysis PDFs should be purchased individually or accessed through Lexis.com if you have a subscription.