Will Defamation Claims in the #MeToo Movement Revive the Self-Defense Privilege for Employers?
Select subscription type
Terms & conditions
Subscribers receive the product(s) listed on the Order Form and any Updates made available during the annual subscription period. Shipping and handling fees are not included in the annual price.
Subscribers are advised of the number of Updates that were made to the particular publication the prior year. The number of Updates may vary due to developments in the law and other publishing issues, but subscribers may use this as a rough estimate of future shipments. Subscribers may call Customer Support at 800-833-9844 for additional information.
Subscribers may cancel this subscription by: calling Customer Support at 800-833-9844; emailing firstname.lastname@example.org; or returning the invoice marked 'CANCEL'.
If subscribers cancel within 30 days after the product is ordered or received and return the product at their expense, then they will receive a full credit of the price for the annual subscription.
If subscribers cancel between 31 and 60 days after the invoice date and return the product at their expense, then they will receive a 5/6th credit of the price for the annual subscription. No credit will be given for cancellations more than 60 days after the invoice date. To receive any credit, subscriber must return all product(s) shipped during the year at their expense within the applicable cancellation period listed above.
In tandem with the growing #MeToo movement, the U.S. has seen a surge in public allegations and an uptick in defamation lawsuits against alleged offenders after they speak out in defense of their reputations. This article examines the self-defense privilege, which was last analyzed by a California court in 1936, and asks: Will we see a resurgence in the self-defense privilege as more employers speak out in an effort to protect their reputations?
Kristina Pham, is a Silicon Valley-based associate with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe and practices employment law. Kristina enjoys reading the news for pop culture employment issues and finding new places to explore in the Bay Area. She can be reached at (650) 614-7414 or email@example.com.
Kevin Whittaker, is Of Counsel with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe. He practices exclusively employment law and represents employers in California and throughout the country. He can be reached at (650) 614-7699 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Ask the LexisNexis experts - and get a complete answer based on today's law.
An authoritative analysis of important cases, codes, statutes, rulings, emerging issues or legal topics is available now - through LexisNexis Emerging Issues Analysis. The brain trust of LexisNexis authors - thousands of recognized authorities who develop the respected Matthew Bender®, Mealey's and Martindale-Hubbell® treatises and articles - produce this highly specific content. Each commentary covers an important case, code, statute, ruling or emerging issue such as subprime, nanotechnology, or climate change. More current and concentrated than treatises and more analytical than news, Emerging Issues Analysis bridges the information gap between the two, providing quick expert analysis of current developments in law.
Emerging Issues Analysis PDFs should be purchased individually or accessed through Lexis.com if you have a subscription.
Table of contents
Tale as Old as Time: The Gender Pay Gap Persists But Faces New Legislative Efforts in the Wake of the #MeToo Movement$70.00
The Clarity Project: The U.S. Department of Labor Issues New Guidance On The Joint Employer Standard$70.00
The California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018: The California Employers' (and Legislature's) Headache for 2019$70.00