Bankruptcy Court Weighs in on Delaware's Prohibition on Deepening Insolvency Claims and Claims Against Directors Based on Relationship with Majority Shareholder
This article explores a decision of a bankruptcy court involving an overwhelming insolvent corporate debtor, where the court accepted Delaware's prohibition against a deepening insolvency claim, and the court relied upon the business judgment rule in rejecting the trustee's claims for breach of fiduciary duties by the debtor's directors that were closely related to a majority shareholder.
Adam M. Lavine is an associate in the Business Finance & Restructuring group at Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP. He received his J.D. from the New York University School of Law, cum laude, and his B.A., magna cum laude, from the University of Pennsylvania. He may be contacted at email@example.com.
Ask the LexisNexis experts - and get a complete answer based on today's law.
An authoritative analysis of important cases, codes, statutes, rulings, emerging issues or legal topics is available now - through LexisNexis Emerging Issues Analysis. The brain trust of LexisNexis authors - thousands of recognized authorities who develop the respected Matthew Bender®, Mealey's and Martindale-Hubbell® treatises and articles - produce this highly specific content. Each commentary covers an important case, code, statute, ruling or emerging issue such as subprime, nanotechnology, or climate change. More current and concentrated than treatises and more analytical than news, Emerging Issues Analysis bridges the information gap between the two, providing quick expert analysis of current developments in law.
Emerging Issues Analysis PDFs should be purchased individually.